Search for: "State v. Connors"
Results 361 - 380
of 2,510
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2018, 7:03 am
”) State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 4:58 pm
See, e.g., Leventhal v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:53 am
By Daniel RichardsonState v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:34 pm
Coakley, is whether the Court’s 2000 decision in Hill v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am
Hodge, Jr., JD, LLM, is the Peter Kiewit Foundation Professor of Law and Director, Center for Public Health Law & Policy, at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, Arizona State University (ASU). [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 4:05 pm
Supreme Court decision West Virginia v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
—, 144 S.Ct. 756 (March 15, 2024), considered with a companion case O’Connor-Radcliffe v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:05 am
During his career, Judge Garza was a strong critic of Roe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 9:14 pm
Justice Ginsburg signaled that would not happen.I had the great good fortune to clerk for Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, the first female United States Supreme Court Justice. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:58 am
In Texas v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:39 am
Indeed, the Supreme Court's last significant decision in this area was one of the last cases in which Justice O'Connor participated--Central Virginia Community College v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:47 am
State v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:55 am
In response to arguments concerning these 14th Amendment claims Justice Sandra Day O’Connor said that "States may discriminate on the basis of age without offending the 14th Amendment if the age classification in question is rationally related to a legitimate state interest. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 12:23 pm
The second case, O’Connor-Ratcliff v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:34 am
In anticipation of the briefing of Dollar General v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 8:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am
On December 22, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 6:05 am
More specifically, in this case the Defendant objected to the Plaintiff's Complaint based on Connor, asserting that the Plaintiff had not cited the specific sections of the Vehicle Code that the Defendant had allegedly violated Judge Nealon primarily relied upon the decision in Com., Dept. of Transportation v. [read post]
