Search for: "State v. Constant" Results 361 - 380 of 1,956
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Note that there are two more cases pending Case C-746/18 H.K. v Prokurator (Opinion handed down by AG Pitruzzella 21 Jan 2020) as well as references from Germany from 2019 and Ireland from 2020. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 3:30 am by Katharine Young
By 1977, a total of thirty-five states had ratified the ERA, falling short of the three-fourths of the states prescribed by Article V. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
         In the case of United States of American v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
         In the case of United States of American v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 8:17 am by Marcus Evans (UK) and Janine Regan (UK)
  The case of Privacy International v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, the Secretary for State for the Home Department and the UK security and intelligence agencies (SIAs) (Case C-623/17) concerns the conditions under which SIAs may process communications metadata (i.e. traffic and location data, not message content) collected by telecommunications providers. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The vices of the Negro are a constant menace to the American who has to repress them sternly. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:04 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
Supreme Court’s landmark environmental decision in Michigan v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:54 pm by Richard Hunt
A standard that requires constant perfection can never be met and therefore guarantees future litigation no matter how diligent any business might be. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm by Giles Peaker
Equity is in the “constant course” of relieving against forfeiture where the tenant pays the rent and all expenses. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Implemented in 1991, Sweden’s carbon tax was one of the first in the world, second only to Finland’s carbon tax, which was implemented a year earlier. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Así fue cómo Thurgood Marshall —el destacado jurista, activista y principal abogado del caso Brown v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Looking around, we observe a political oligarchy (Congress) seamed with money and celebrity, hardly able to govern, increasingly irrelevant even as it remains at the heart of an old “republican” constitution; passionate demands (our commentators call them “populism”) for more than the state can summon the will or means to provide, from real economic security to dignity and recognition in a fragmented society (our commentators call it “polarization”),… [read post]