Search for: "State v. Cooper"
Results 361 - 380
of 8,496
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2009, 6:31 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:57 am
The style of the case is, Hollingshead v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:18 am
The FPF Report mentions that the EDPB recommends the harmonization of procedural aspects of GDPR enforcement, with a focus on “the (i) status and rights of the parties to the administrative procedures, (ii) procedural deadlines, (iii) requirements for admissibility or dismissal of complaints, (iv) investigative powers of SAs, and (v) the overall implementation of the cooperation procedure”. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
European Union International Extradition Treaty with the United States June 25, 2003, Date-Signed February 1, 2010, Date-In-Force THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Desiring further to facilitate cooperation between the European Union Member States and the United States of America, Desiring to combat crime in a more effective way as a means of protecting their respective democratic societies and common values, Having Due Regard for… [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm
The defendant relied on State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:10 am
In in South [Dakota] v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 3:47 am
U.S. v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 11:02 am
See PerSeptive Biosystems, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 8:57 am
The Crime of Aggression and the Case of Western Sahara Alison Bisset, And then Two Came Along at Once: Inter-State Cooperation on Core Crimes, the ilc and the Group of Core States Iryna Marchuk, Transitional Justice and a State’s Response to Mass Atrocity: Reassessing the Obligations to Investigate and Prosecute, written by Jacopo Roberti di Sarsina [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
Empire refused to cooperate. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:56 am
” In Johnson v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 2:47 am
U.S. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 8:27 am
Defendants eventually moved for summary judgment on the cancellation, proof of loss, and non-cooperation grounds. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:17 am
More importantly, if we are going to compare apples to oranges, the ACA’s Medicaid provisions have an explicit provision stating that if the state declines to participate, it loses the program funds (this was the provision at issue in NFIB v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:04 am
Dec. 13, 2023Ulis v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:00 pm
In Cooper v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 12:50 pm
The Feb. 26, 2007 ruling of Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:15 pm
” The court went on to cite the leading case on cooperation—Mancia v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 3:28 pm
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Richards, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1841 (23 July 2008) Cooper, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1856 (31 July 2008) Norman, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1810 (31 July 2008) B & Ors, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1997 (15 August 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Dragonfly Consultancy Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs [2008] EWHC 2113 (Ch) (03 September 2008) High Court (Commercial Court) Aspinall’s Club Ltd v… [read post]
