Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 361 - 380
of 4,047
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2022, 4:31 am
” The New York Court of Appeals — the state’s highest court — also agreed with the outcome but disagreed with both lower courts’ rationales. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 11:34 am
It's no longer a secret to which three judges the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has assigned the Epic Games v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 8:59 am
” McAllister v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 4:34 am
The Court ruled: Inasmuch as the Appellate Division has already determined that Mr. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
In summary, in serious need of a visit to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am
First and foremost, in Clibbery v Allan [2002] EWCA Civ 45; [2002] Fam 261 the Court of Appeal made clear that parties to financial remedy proceedings owe an undertaking to the court not to use information disclosed by the other party under compulsion for any purpose other than the proper purposes of the proceedings, and it is a breach of that undertaking and a contempt of court for a party to publish such information. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit was before three women judges. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE FLORIDA United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 9:27 pm
But as I explained in the post I just linked to, there is a risk of the appeals court having qualms over a single-brand market definition (though the Kodak standard is not just met here, but the case is even stronger than Kodak was). [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
Some time during the new year, the New York Court of Appeals will address the conflict between the First and Second Appellate Division Departments on the common-law duty to take minimal precautions to take minimal precautions to protect tenants from foreseeable harm. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 7:00 am
That same day, the New York Court of Appeals (the state court of last resort) denied an emergency motion for leave to appeal the denial of the stay. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 2:46 pm
Where it says, quite clearly, "COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 3:55 pm
I doubt that Yeshiva's return to state court will be fruitful, and I see no reason why we should not grant a stay at this time. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Jennifer, indeed, is admirably candid: “I am skeptical of democracy tout court, and almost as dubious about a majority-based deliberative process even if it were held under purportedly constraining rules. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 4:44 am
Things can get even more tricky when one state’s laws refer the court back to the other state’s laws, and vice versa. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:37 am
Its temporary (but indefinite) withdrawal from the German market enables the high-volume smartphone maker (and its OnePlus affiliate) to stand its ground in court:Motions to stay the enforcement of those four injunctions are pending, and while I can't predict what the appeals courts in Munich and Karlsruhe (the latter for the Mannheim rulings) will do, there are serious issues that may very well prove outcome-determinative.OPPO is now aggressively seeking its own… [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:34 am
” The Court Grants Reargument Last March, however, the Epstein case took on new life following a motion to reargue by Epstein who argued that Steinbeck was overruled sub silentio by the Court of Appeals’ 2018 opinion in Congel v Malfitano, a wrongful partnership dissolution case that I wrote about here, in which the Court, quoting from a 1939 Court of Appeals opinion in Lanier v Bowdoin, wrote: The partners… [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:30 am
The application was rejected at first instance by the Cancellation Division, but the decision was reversed by the Second Board of Appeal which declared the trademark invalid. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:30 am
The application was rejected at first instance by the Cancellation Division, but the decision was reversed by the Second Board of Appeal which declared the trademark invalid. [read post]
