Search for: "State v. Crews" Results 361 - 380 of 1,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am by Allan Blutstein
The case otherwise strikes me as a commonsense application of the logic of CREW v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:26 am by Laura Sandwell
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Gill v Anagnost, Crews and Grenier (United States) A libel action brought in the New Hampshire state court concerning the posting of defamatory statements on a billboard by mortgage broker Michael Gill. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 8:36 am by Eric S. Solotoff
To the extent Crews and Hughes implicitly required that marital lifestyle be determined numerically, we now explicitly state a finding of marital lifestyle must be made by explaining the characteristics of the lifestyle and quantifying it. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:15 am by Lawyer Sanders
   The whistleblower’s note stated: “We are asking help to any authorities concerned about this, because we must protect our environment and our marine lives. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:48 pm by James Beard
It is up to the vessel owner and crew’s employer to provide each crew a safe, seaworthy vessel and safe place to work. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:15 pm
While conducting a visual inspection of a crew member's cabin, one of the inspectors spotted a DVD he found suspicious. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:15 pm
While conducting a visual inspection of a crew member's cabin, one of the inspectors spotted a DVD he found suspicious. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 4:47 pm
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:41 pm
An individual may have an odor of alcohol but not be intoxicated or impaired within the legal definition as held in People v Miller and Mulvean v Fox. [read post]