Search for: "State v. D. M. B." Results 361 - 380 of 3,597
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
In his ruling on A & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2014] EWHC 1364 (Admin) Mr Justice King held that the claimant, whose ordinary/usual residence was in Northern Ireland, was not entitled to access in England abortion services free of charge. (13 May 2014). [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am by INFORRM
The roadmap expressly states it is not a guide to future compliance, but rather an information document setting out Ofcom’s present thinking. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
In Sweeny v Ireland [2017] IEHC 702 (23 November 2017) Baker J in the High Court struck down section 9(1)(b) of the Offences Against the State (Amendment) Act, 1998 (also here), which provided for a wide offence of withholding material information from Gardaí, on the grounds that it infringed the right to silence derived from the right to freedom of expression in Article 40. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The Case of the Vague Virgule Lengyel-Fushimi v Rothfus, 2022 NY Slip Op 30809(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Mar. 10, 2022], a case this blog previously featured here, involves a multi-faceted dispute among the non-managing Class B and Class C members and the Class A managing members of a successful Brooklyn beer brewery and taproom. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 8:35 pm by Josh Blackman
Here, I'd like to flag some changes made to the permitting process. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:40 am by Roy Black
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Criminal Action No. 20-10177-PBS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
  I’m not writing this to shame or judge other lawyers. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Typically D argues that I’m using the term in mere advertising copy/not in a TM space. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Like most secular Jews, I’m particularly interested in a particular Talmudic passage that Levine cites, Bava Metzia 59b, from the Babylonian Talmud. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
D, but ornamentality is interesting b/c it might divest you of rights, but also might help prove nonfunctionality for protection purposes. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm by admin
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]