Search for: "State v. D. U." Results 361 - 380 of 2,454
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2022, 12:04 pm by Elizabeth McElvein, Benjamin Wittes
Circuit action has taken place in the case of Trump v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 1:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In my round-up of top D&O stories from 2021, I cited the recent rise of U.S. derivative lawsuit filings against the boards of non-U.S. companies as one of the year’s most important D&O liability and insurance stories. [read post]
In terms of legislative proposals, Senator Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) introduced the New, Emerging, and Exciting Technologies in Transportation (NEXT) Act (S. 3067), which would create an online public-facing resource center to help state and local communities develop intelligent transportation programs. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
No state recognizes such a sweeping right of publicity that it is subject to zero countervailing First Amendment protections. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is not often that a court allows reargument, states that it misapplied the law, and reverses itself as took place in Orlando v Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene  Genovese & Gluck, P.C. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:57 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Section 1806 (c) and (d) require the federal or a state government to provide notice to an aggrieved person whenever it intends to introduce such information as evidence in any proceedings against that person. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:45 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
It happened to be the lower court’s ruling in Shapiro v Ettison, 2015 NY Slip Op 31670 [U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2015]. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:03 am by Pamela Wolf
” The email stated that by participating, the recipient and the employer “both waive[d] the right to initiate or participate in court litigation . . . involving a covered claim” and that recipients “would be automatically enrolled” in the program “[u]nless you opt out … within the next 30 days. [read post]