Search for: "State v. David A. Miller"
Results 361 - 380
of 683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
As David Letterman used to ask, “Is this anything?” [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In Frisby v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
” Alex Spence at Buzzfeed has uncovered the fact that the Telegraph hired Sir David Eady, who they described as “the judge who stops us from knowing the truth,” to conduct a secret internal inquiry. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:04 am
Miller and Robbie Ethridge, A Promise Kept: The Muscogee (Creek) Nation and McGirt v. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 9:24 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we offer some unconventional thoughts about the highly-anticipated Sebelius v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:57 am
The American position, so they explain, is unforgiving and typified by the decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
The devil remains in the details.The ILB has also received a press release from David Miller of Ohio Citizens for Community Values (CCV), which includes this statement:"[I]n other states like Arizona, Indiana, Florida, and California, where same-sex marriage advocates were arguing that amendments like Ohio's would dismantle domestic violence laws, this argument now is moot and off the table in the public policy debate over marriage amendments. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court observed in the context of high school students in Tinker v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
That case—G.G. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 11:51 am
Miller, Estella M. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 9:26 am
MG Miller informed Mr. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
In Janus v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
” In challenging this federal directive, San Francisco relies on principles of federalism as expounded in Printz v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
And they also understand that the state’s ostensible goal—anti-pollution—could be more precisely accomplished by a law that is more directly tailored to the state’s purpose, a ban on littering (as the Court reasoned in Schneider v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
State, 686 S.E.2d 483, 485-86 (Ga. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
[16] David Oliver et al., Florida Gov. [read post]
8 May 2007, 10:31 am
United States (D.C. [read post]
