Search for: "State v. E. C." Results 361 - 380 of 9,369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm by Tomasz Tadeusz Koncewicz
This was spelled out quite unequivocally by the Court in C-357/19: “… compliance by a Member State with the values enshrined in Article 2 TEU is a condition for the enjoyment of all the rights deriving from the application of the Treaties to that Member State. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 6:44 am by Mark Ashton
The other side wails (a) I was never consulted (b) too dangerous (c) too expensive (d) infringes on my time with the children (e) requires travel to other states with meals, lodging and tournament fees that cost more than a trip to see the Masters Tournament at Augusta. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
Felicito a Cuba por su presidencia exitosa del G-77 y le agradezco la cálida bienvenida y la hospitalidad que me ha brindado. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 10:57 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The BIA determined that Avila’s PSG did not “exist independently” of the harm alleged, as required under Matter of M-E-V-G-113 and Matter of W-G-R-. 114 Matter of M-E-V-G- cites to this Court’s prior precedent in Lukwago v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 2:05 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
” In addition, Florida Statutes Section 542.18  states that, “[e]very contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce in this state is unlawful. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am by David Pocklington
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Eventually, the employee received a Record of Employment from 260 stating that she was employed from November 6, 2017 to December 13, 2017. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Eventually, the employee received a Record of Employment from 260 stating that she was employed from November 6, 2017 to December 13, 2017. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 4:07 am by Allan Blutstein
Md.) -- concluding that agency performed adequate search for records pertaining to agency’s denial of plaintiff’s application to adjust his residency status, and that agency properly withheld records pursuant to Exemptions 7(C) and 7(E). [read post]