Search for: "State v. Eager " Results 361 - 380 of 1,111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2009, 1:49 pm
Collette, is eager to see how, or if, the Court tweaks the Kreiner standard. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am by Larry Catá Backer
As such, it is no different from numerous such conflicts all over the world, where host states, eager for the returns of foreign direct investment and following the mantra of sustainable development, seek to develop their own resources in accordance with host state environmental and developmental policies.[2] In so doing, governments and corporations sometimes find themselves confronted by communities who, while engaging in local resistance, share the common language of… [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
" The state was eager to defend that decision before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:47 pm by Walter Olson
That confirms that the Bloomberg-appointed Board of Health, in its eagerness to assert powers not rightly its own, had casually broken the law. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:09 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
The Minnesota Court of Appeals decided that these types of warrants do not violate the United States and Minnesota constitutions per se, and further found that the warrant at issue in State of Minnesota v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:17 pm by Eva Galperin and Nate Cardozo
The "golden key" that Admiral Rogers and FBI Director Comey are so eager to get their hands on will of course work no matter who's holding it. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 11:32 am by Thomas Merrill
  PPL and the United States (which has filed a brief on the merits supporting PPL) rely heavily on United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:25 am by Stefanie Levine
In this sense, Judge Newman seems eager to analyze the claims based on §§112, 102 and 103, but not based on §101, as was encouraged in Research Corporation v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:25 am by Stefanie Levine
In this sense, Judge Newman seems eager to analyze the claims based on §§112, 102 and 103, but not based on §101, as was encouraged in Research Corporation v. [read post]