Search for: "State v. Events Intern., Inc."
Results 361 - 380
of 1,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2020, 9:30 am
First, the Louisiana Supreme Court on November 4, 2020 denied the Louisiana Department of Revenue’s writ application in Smith International, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 9:30 am
First, the Louisiana Supreme Court on November 4, 2020 denied the Louisiana Department of Revenue’s writ application in Smith International, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm
In support of this argument, Mooppan and CSS lawyer Lori Windham repeatedly cited Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm
Later this morning, the Supreme Court will hear argument in the most significant Religion Clause case of the Term, Fulton v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm
Video Gaming Technologies Inc., 19-1298Issue: Whether a generally applicable state ad valorem tax, as assessed against personal property owned by a non-Indian, out-of-state corporate entity and leased to a tribe for use in its casino operations, is preempted by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and the Supreme Court’s “particularized inquiry” balancing test from White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 8:43 pm
This case was thought to be of great significance by many commentators because it could open the door for enforcement of arbitral awards issued by foreign institution with seat of proceeding in China, and demonstrates the opening-up trend for foreign legal service. [1]Brentwood Industries Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:04 pm
” Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc., No. 17-11414 (D. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Mountain Lion Foundation v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
Community Tenants Union, Inc., 42 Ohio St.2d 242, 246, 327 N.E.2d 753 (1975)). [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 12:50 pm
In BMW of North America, Inc v Gore (517 US 559 (1996)), she dissented from another decision reviewing an allegedly excessive punitive-damages award and argued that the Court should ‘resist unnecessary intrusion into an area dominantly of state concern. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am
Facebook Inc applied to set aside the orders for its service in the United States, among other things. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:07 pm
At the time of the events giving rise to this action, it was engaged in the business of international sales of agricultural commodities. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 6:15 pm
State of U.P. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 12:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 1:21 pm
Background On AB 5 AB 5, as of January 1, 2020, codified the ABC Test for employee status adopted in the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:46 am
Background On AB 5 AB 5, which took effect on January 1, 2020, codified the ABC Test for employee status adopted in the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 3:34 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm
For example, in the 2015 case Harris v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:05 am
Even in the event of such an agreement, he described the prospect that the Chinese courts would embark on the exercise as no more than speculative. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
United States, 558 U.S. 310, 352 (2010) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
