Search for: "State v. Favors" Results 361 - 380 of 37,284
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2024, 1:05 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Felten underlined the difference between other states’ laws (in that case Texas), and Illinois concerning blue-penciling, stating that Illinois is not in favor of the practice and only allows courts to enforce restrictive covenants by modifying them, if doing so only involves minor changes. 2017 WL 11500971, at *4 (N.D. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 4:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
” The Court’s opinion in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm by Ilya Somin
This is now the second big takings case in a row on which the justices reached  unanimous agreement in favor of the property rights side, following in the footsteps of last year's important ruling in Tyler v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:56 am by Amy Howe
California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
By providing each presidential candidate with a large return (in the form of the state’s entire electoral college bloc) for the candidate’s promises and platform planks targeted to the state’s electorate, the state increases the likelihood that all candidates will take the state seriously and address its needs and concerns.But Nebraska currently (and historically) has eschewed a winner-take-all approach in favor of a district-by-district… [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:00 pm by Gary J. Simson
United States would have any greater negative effects than Supreme Court recusals ordinarily do, those effects plainly don’t outweigh the factors militating in favor of recusal.If, as seems all too likely, Justice Thomas refuses to recuse himself in Trump v. [read post]