Search for: "State v. Forty"
Results 361 - 380
of 2,712
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Imagine the following scenario:-- Congress decides that carrot consumption is very important, and accordingly offers the states carrots to distribute to needy citizens, largely at federal expense.-- The States naturally accept the carrots, and distribute them on the terms Congress prescribes, for over forty years. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 5:28 am
They clearly are a source of law, as the plaintiffs found in Singer v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 8:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
” Kansas v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 9:19 am
The Court for the first time approved the ministerial exception, a rule that the state and lower federal courts had used for forty years to dismiss lawsuits by “ministers” against their religious employers, including churches, elementary and secondary schools, universities and hospitals. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 6:27 am
The Justices should have a relaxing moment with Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 1:16 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 1:16 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 8:53 am
See Barrows v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 12:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 6:48 am
The case is entitled Chevalier v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:04 pm
Gonyou v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Ratification was advised by the Senate of the United States of America on June 21, 1976. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Forty-nine years after Roe, 24 states joined briefs in Dobbs criticizing the decision; 228 members of Congress supported briefs asking that the question of abortion be returned to the states (236 wanted the decision in Roe to be left in place); and, fed by increasingly strident rhetoric on both sides, opinion was arguably even more divided over abortion than when the Court decided Roe.The hope that a single Supreme Court decision like Roe v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 1:22 pm
In San Clemente Estates v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
After the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Alleyne v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this convention. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 5:08 am
In Harbison v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:07 am
United States, the challenge to Arizona’s S.B. 1070 immigration law. [read post]
