Search for: "State v. G. D. F." Results 361 - 380 of 2,300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
One New Jersey appellate court upheld the disqualification of an expert witness who had worked for the State of New Jersey on a case that involved confidential disclosures by the State’s lawyers and its agencies, which disclosures were necessarily involved in the expert witness’s subsequent retention by the State’s adversary in a different case.[10] This decision, like most in this area, turned on a close analysis of the facts and circumstances of the… [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:30 am by Robert Harper
  UAGPPJA does so by “providing a more streamlined and predictable process, saving state funds and conserving judicial resources, and reducing the possibility for abuse and expense of the alleged incapacitated person and that person’s family and caretakers” (see id.; Schwaber & Kafer, P.C. v Alpizar, Index No. 157599/2020, 2021 WL 408231, at *2 [Sup Ct, New York County Feb. 5, 2021]). [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:54 am
Reading their essays gives one a good picture of the state of issues that are boiling just beneath the surface within Cuba. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:07 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The Enlarged Board must examine the above admissibility requirements with respect to each referred question individually (see, for example, G 3/08 and G 2/19). [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 8:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
Arizona (d, f, g, w, pp) 2.59% > $0 2.59% > $0 $12,550 $25,100 n.a. n.a. $100 credit   3.34% > $27,272 3.34% > $54,544             4.17% > $54,544 4.17% > $109,088             4.50% > $163,632 4.50% > $327,263             8.00% > $250,000 8.00% > $500,000           Arkansas (h, i, o, dd, oo) 2.00% > $0 2.00% >… [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
When is a transaction subject to the digital advertising tax “in the state”? [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:20 am
  Indeed, one is now beginning to see that way that private actors are attempting to use the methods of data driven governance to hold state and state systems accountable. [read post]
”  Thus, “[g]iven the carve-out,” the court could not “say that the [agreement] evince[d] a ‘clear and unmistakable’ intent to delegate arbitrability” as to the carved-out claims. [read post]