Search for: "State v. GP" Results 361 - 380 of 1,811
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 9:52 am by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Many commentators have observed that the case bears similarities to United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:56 pm by Ruth Levor
 Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court answered with a unanimous "yes" in United States v Jones, 565 U. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 8:55 pm
The controversial condition of polygraph testing as a component of sex offender mental health treatment had been approved by the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 8:01 am by Amanda Frost
On November 8, the Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:47 am by SHG
California, supra; United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:50 pm by johntfloyd
Supreme this past January 23rd in United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:35 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions Department for Education v Molyneux [2012] EWCA Civ 193 (28 February 2012) Independent Trustee Services Ltd v GP Noble Trustees Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 195 (28 February 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Decisions Secretary of State for the Home Department v Tuncel & Anor [2012] EWHC 402 (Admin) (28 February 2012) High Court (Commercial Court) Decisions Barclay Pharmaceuticals Ltd & Ors… [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 11:41 am
Even though there is no law specifically concerning cell phone tracking, an analogy can be made with the recent case of US v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Suzanne Ito
In January, the Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:35 pm by Colin O'Keefe
We touched on it a bit yesterday, but today's roundup is quite heavy on United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:22 am by Cyrus Farivar
The use of GPS tracking devices surreptitiously installed on cars recalls the famous Jones v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 3:30 pm by Rachit Buch
The Court stated that it “does not consider” inclusion on the performers list to be a possession. [read post]