Search for: "State v. Hague" Results 361 - 380 of 1,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2020, 8:43 am by Paula Lombardi
Recently, two cases State of Netherlands v Urgenda (December 20, 2019) and Juliana v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The judge granted the motion, correctly recognizing that if Rubio was residing in a state party to the Hague Service Convention, the Convention would not apply because Rubio’s address was unknown and that if Rubio was residing in an Inter-American Convention state, that Convention is not exclusive and thus would not bar service by email. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
Massachusetts v EPA, 549 US 497 (2007); Comer v Murphy Oil USA, 839 F Supp (2d) 849 (SD Miss 2012); Native Village of Kivalina v ExxonMobil Corp, 696 F 3d 849 (9th Cir 2012). [4] Friends of the Earth v Canada (Governor in Council), 2008 FC 1184, aff’d 2009 FCA 297, leave to appeal to the SCC denied, [2009] SCCA 497. [5] Turp v Canada, 2012 FC 893. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 12:26 pm by Christine Nielsen
Not only does U.S. law permit service of process via alternative means where it can be demonstrated to be a reasonable way to inform parties of a pending action and provide them with an opportunity to response, but The Hague Service Convention Article also permits service through alternative means provided that the destination state does not object to those means. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 8:23 am
(Notably, last week another member of the Council met with ICC Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo at the court's Hague headquarters, above right. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 7:51 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Baz v Patterson, 2024 WL 1879035 (Seventh Circuit, 2024) [Germany][Petition granted] [Habitual residence]   In Baz v Patterson, 2024 WL 1879035 (Seventh Circuit, 2024) Asli Baz, a citizen of Germany, filed suit seeking to compel Anthony Patterson, a citizen of the United States, to return their six-year-old son, A.P., from Illinois to Germany. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
Because Russia had unilaterally suspended cooperation with the United States under the Hague Service Convention (a fact noted in the discussion of the case of the day from March 4, Baldiga v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 1:37 pm
As was recently reported on this blog, this past May the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Ashcroft v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 8:34 am
"The decision comes after the failure to date of diplomatic efforts, not only with Japan on a bilateral plane, but also, on a multistate level, with member states of the International Whaling Commission (logo above left). [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 4:59 am by Jennifer Weisberg Millner
  On May 17, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in Abbott v. [read post]