Search for: "State v. Items of Property"
Results 361 - 380
of 2,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Intellectual property is a field in which only the most innovative thrive. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 1:53 am
In Tamara Smith v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 12:11 pm
Dyment, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 417 for the proposition that abandonment of an item automatically disposes of one’s privacy interest in that item: In R. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
United States (1908) and Indian trust doctrine under United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 3:13 am
The hearing on April 16th will be held at Georgia State University College of Law in Atlanta. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 1:48 pm
"Assigned to this significant forfeiture case is Chief Judge Thomas Hogan, which is captioned of United States of America v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:24 pm
But in Georgia v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:21 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:21 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 2:19 pm
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Cultural Resources)State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlDuke S. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:06 pm
Curry, 912 NE 2d 272 – Ill: Appellate Court, 2nd Dist. 2009 Actions for replevin must be filed in the state and county where the items are located. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 12:15 pm
He says he'd lose control over all but 10,000 square feet of his property but still be liable to keep it up to state standards. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 8:42 am
When considering whether a trademarked design is functional, the Court will look to: (1) the existence of a utility patent, expired or unexpired, that involves or describes the functionality of an item’s design element; (2) the utilitarian properties of the item’s unpatented design elements; (3) advertising of the item that touts the utilitarian advantages of the item’s design elements; (4) the dearth of, or difficulty in creating,… [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 12:31 am
It seems to me that is not the most desirable state of affairs. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:49 am
United States, taxpayers have argued that the Sixteenth Amendment only authorizes taxation of realized income—this is, that gain from appreciated property can only be taxed as “income” when there has been a sale or conversion of that property. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:49 am
United States, taxpayers have argued that the Sixteenth Amendment only authorizes taxation of realized income—this is, that gain from appreciated property can only be taxed as “income” when there has been a sale or conversion of that property. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:57 am
Citing People v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 7:27 am
The appellant argued that the VAT was a mandatory inclusion in his price which was state imposed and therefore he was collecting on behalf of the state. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:36 pm
Scope Disputes: Although the new and amended statutory sections should not disturb the 1997 decision I obtained for Nationwide in Kawa v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 9:05 pm
Myers v. [read post]
