Search for: "State v. JO" Results 361 - 380 of 663
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2017, 7:14 am by Beth Van Schaack
For example, in support of his conclusion in Kiobel v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 2:25 am by Hannah McAslan (UK) and Patty Tan
Since posting this update, we understand that there have been further developments in several EU27 Member States as to the temporary transitional measures that are available, and we have updated our summary table to reflect these developments. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:27 am by David Cosgrove
”[ii]SEC Chairwoman Mary Jo White supports tighter regulations for those making funding recommendation to investors. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 9:33 am
He is a patent attorney advocate and appeared in the Court of Appeal for England and Wales on Wednesday in Lantana Ltd v Registrar of Patents. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 11:53 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Son miembros además la secretaria del Departamento de Justicia, Wanda Vázquez y el secretario del Departamento de la Vivienda, Fernando Gil. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:51 am by James R. Marsh
Marsh, Jennifer Freeman and Jo-Hanna Read represent Amy in this litigation; Carol L. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:11 am by Ronald Collins
Sharp and the Supreme Court’s 1967 opinion in Loving v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am by Graeme Hall
Secretary of State for the Home Department v CD [2011] EWHC 2087 (Admin) (29 July 2011): Control order ruled lawful: “reasonable grounds for suspecting CD is a leading figure in network of Islamist extremists” – see guardian.co.uk SCHALK AND KOPF v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
New York County 2012), citing, Mosher-Simons v County of Allegany, 99 NY2d 214, 219, 783 N.E.2d 509, 753 N.Y.S.2d 444 (2002), quoting Tarter v State of New York. 68 NY2d 511, 518, 503 N.E.2d 84, 510 N.Y.S.2d 528 (1986). [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 5:30 am by Don Cruse
LUZELMA CAMPOS, BETTY JO GONZALEZ, AND MISTY VALERO, No. 11-0728 Per Curiam This case under the Texas Tort Claims Act involves the intersection between two quirks of the Texas statute — that that statute bars claims for intentional torts against the State and that any negligence claims for personal injury against the State generally must flow from the use of “tangible personal property. [read post]