Search for: "State v. Jean" Results 361 - 380 of 1,117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2011, 8:57 am
"An agreement that violates the term limits rule is against public policy (see Matter of City of Utica Urban Renewal Agency v Doyle, 66 AD3d 1495; Karedes v Village of Endicott, 297 AD2d 413, 415). [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 9:01 pm
At 11 a.m, the Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in Ali v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In any event, the purpose of awarding [*2]treble damages for a violation of Judiciary Law § 487 is to punish a lawyer for his misconduct and to deter him from future misconduct, rather than to compensate a plaintiff for her injury (see Jean v Chinitz, 163 AD3d 497, 499 [1st Dept 2018]). [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 5:52 am by admin
First, whether § 51 applies to all state building codes or “only those concerning fire safety” as stated in McAllister v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 1:32 am
As Amazon is not to be seen under items I to V, Amazon does not fall under vi. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 12:59 pm by ACLU
Billie Jean King There is no place in any sport for discrimination of any kind. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 2:28 am
Kenneth Skolaut, No. 97,401 (Sedgwick)State appeal (question reserved) (petition for review)Jean K. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 10:20 am
On Tuesday, the Court heard argument in Winkelman v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:18 pm by Joshua Crawford
The Supreme Court of the United States, as recently as this past term in Bond v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:51 am
Jean Claude Compas, who stated that he had personally mailed, by certified mail, the NF-2 to Elrac on July 6, 2010, the 30th day following the accident date. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 7:00 am
Criminal law: Jean-Philippe Mailhot admitted to stabbing his wife 33 times before she died. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 12:06 pm
However, in two spots, where The Professor was clearly stating his own personal opinion, we noted that. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
Cheever, in which the Court will consider the scope of a defendant’s Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination when he introduces evidence regarding his mental state to counter the charges against him; and Kaley v. [read post]