Search for: "State v. Jeremy D."
Results 361 - 380
of 430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2016, 9:47 am
In Pearson v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
Trademark: In Jack Daniel’s v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: Art, access and the public domain after Bridgeman v Corel’ – 29 April, New York City: (creativecommons.org), (Public Knowledge) US: ACI ‘Paragraph IV disputes’ conference – 30 April – 1 May, New York City: (Orange Book Blog) Pharma & Biotech Pharma & Biotech - General Canada: Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) departs from its guidelines in determining price in recent decision: (Gowlings), … [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
Economics Johnston, Carl A. and Curtis D. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
The Scottish Legal, Press Gazette and Scottish Newspaper Society Jeremy Clarkson’s column on Meghan Markle for The Sun, dated 16 December 2022, has received the most complaints in IPSO’s history. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
D, but ornamentality is interesting b/c it might divest you of rights, but also might help prove nonfunctionality for protection purposes. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
Discussant: Jeremy Sheff There’s no abandonment through continuity of use in a way that fails Linford’s test for continuity of goodwill—you can change your product/service and not abandon as long as you are a going concern. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation David Cameron has said he would be willing to meet with victims of press abuse, after being asked by Jeremy Corbyn during Prime Minister’s Questions. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
Department of Justice, moderated panelists: Jeremy J. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
Miss United States of America, LLC. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
Matteoni, Matteoni O’Laughlin & Hechtman, San Jose, California, Edward V. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:55 am
If you'd like to host this meeting, please email IPKat team member Jeremy here, though it may take him a day or two to get back to you. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 7:53 pm
On the other hand, the recent finding in Virginia (in its Supreme Court, second time around) that the state’s anti-spam law was unconstitutional (in the case of exceptionally commercial spammer Jeremy Jaynes) and the broader debate on spam and the First Amendment is of some comparative interest and does indicate that the matter, at least as far as US law is concerned, is not settled. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:53 am
or Groves v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle), (In … [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 2:45 pm
Joseph Sanders (University of Houston): Milward v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 8:57 pm
Accordingly, in the absence of a constitutional challenge, the rules clearly stated in the Code of Civil Procedure are what apply. [21] In Lac d’Amiante, the Court noted that in Quebec, “[t]he fundamental law concerning civil procedure is the law enacted by the National Assembly . [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm
Ritz Camera & Image v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm
Jefferson Powell, Constitutional Conscience (Chicago, 2008) Jeremy A Rabkin, Law Without Nations? [read post]
