Search for: "State v. K. T." Results 361 - 380 of 3,506
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2013, 5:01 am by Matt Bodie
  As the court states: [T]he government’s primary argument is that because K & L Contractors is a secular, for‐profit enterprise, no rights under RFRA are implicated at all. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:19 pm by Armand Grinstajn
[V] […] In deciding on the basis of the set of claims filed [before the summons to OPs], the ED decided on the basis of a set of claims which was no longer agreed by the applicant because new requests had been filed with letter of 5 November 2007. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 6:36 am by Florian Mueller
Thomas Kuehnen ("Kühnen" in German), who presides over one of two patent-specialized divisions of the Dusseldorf Higher Regional Court (regional appeals court), made no secret of his disagreement with Sisvel v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 3:03 pm by Armand Grinstajn
The board's decision would affect the patent for all its designated states. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 5:43 am by Joe Patrice
[Law.com] * Senator Mike Lee has joined the liberals in asking nominees if they support Brown v. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
Three days later, on August 26, 2015, Wohl again contacted Agent Hornback stating there was another armed robbery of a T-Mobile located in DeKalb, Illinois, which he believed was related to the previous three robberies because the (708) 543-7900 phone number was in the area at the time of the robbery.Thereafter, Agent Hornback contacted the DeKalb Police Department and learned that three of the robbers—K'Ron Price, Paul Grissom, and Tyren Windell—were… [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:57 am
  Off-label use doesn’t turn a 510(k) device into a device that wasn’t cleared. [read post]