Search for: "State v. Lámar" Results 361 - 380 of 412
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Mar. 24, 2005); Eberts v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Mar. 24, 2005); Eberts v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
It stated all the dosages correctly as well as the consequences of overdose. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
Thus, in this setting, it makes abundant sense to allow a State that chooses to incorporate a federal standard into its law of torts to allow that standard to apply when the federal agency itself determines that fraud marred the regulatory-approval process.385 F.3d at 965-66 (a bunch of Buckman citations omitted) (emphasis added).The Second Circuit in Desiano did not agree. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:30 am
La. 2008) (granting motion to dismiss master complaint); Barasich v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 12:20 pm
Daryanani, Michelle La Mar, Loeb & Loeb LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Kevin J. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
Trademark vs branding – Sci Fi Channel will now be called Syfy (China Hearsay)   Europe CFI: Mars loses CTM right in 3D shape for chocolate snacks: Mars v OHIM, Ludwig Schokolade (Class 46) (The IP Factor) CFI: James Bond fails again to defeat DR. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
(Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) Hill Times features op-ed by Michael Geist concerning copyright lobby recycling (Michael Geist) Owner of Glo Salon and Spa sues former employees now working at competitor for $6.4 million in damages over alleged misappropriation of trade secrets in the form of client lists and client colour cards (IP Osgoode) Federal court issues practice direction aimed at streamlining complex litigation (International Law Office)   China Get involved in Chinese IP policy… [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 10:14 am
This is the second TV film by Adelita Coriat and combines the original shown last September (over 1000 viewings) it divulges more facts about the scams on Isla Solarte in the Bocas del Toro archipelago selling RoP (Derechos Possesorios) of state owned land in Panama. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Mar. 24, 2009)Affirming dismissal of White cops' 2003 race/layoff claims based on a 1973 Consent DecreeFantini v Salem State College, No. 07-2026 (1st Cir. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
That testimony killed the plaintiff's standard product liability case, because under California (and almost all other states') law, a plaintiff cannot establish causation in an inadequate warning case where the prescribing physician did not rely upon the allegedly defective warning. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 10:01 pm
State, 2001-1329 (La. 2/26/02) (on the importance of the Rule 10 writ-grant considerations) A Writ in Time, 51 La. [read post]