Search for: "State v. List"
Results 361 - 380
of 27,355
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2010, 2:49 pm
Terry Lenamon’s List of Major United States Supreme Court Death Penalty Cases:Furman v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 7:33 am
State of Indiana, mentioned earlier today in the transfer list entry, and in... [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:05 pm
As expected, yesterday’s SCOTUS Order List included the denial of cert in Miller v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 2:49 pm
As expected, today’s SCOTUS order list included the denial of certiorari in Mullins v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 11:55 am
Today's order list included the denial of certiorari in Sanchez v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:07 pm
Updating a long list of earlier ILB entries about the case of Wilkes v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:13 am
Today's order list provides: 06-589 CHRISTIAN CIVIC LEAGUE OF MAINE V. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:49 am
Labs., Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:49 am
Labs., Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
Miller won in State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:58 am
On 20 May 2020, the UK Supreme Court ruled in Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and another [2020] UKSC 20 that a planning inspector, in considering an appeal under sections 20 or 39 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, may ‘go behind’ the listing and re-determine its validity afresh on the merits. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 5:46 pm
View the article here The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 6:42 am
Access online today’s Order List of the U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 11:51 am
To negate standing, the state submitted a list of 9 Tofurky labels that it said were fine. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 1:36 pm
Briggs, No. 19-108 and United States v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:56 am
View the updated list on the continuation of this blog post. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:22 am
Recently, South Carolina joined the ranks of states standing up to insurers on this issue, with the state supreme court ruling in Williams v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:36 am
Here, the Court did not find that the pattern of 911 and 311 calls by the Dawsons, the promises to put the family on the "Special Attention List", or suggestions that the family move or be placed in a protective status created such a special relationship, under either the first or second prongs of the Ashburn test. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:55 am
As this Court made very clear in State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:14 am
To review the Court of Appeal opinion, click this link - Kern County Water Agency v. [read post]
