Search for: "State v. Mai X." Results 361 - 380 of 3,553
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
That's inconsistent with both the letter and spirit of the one Supreme Court case that construes Section 4, Perry v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:52 pm by Chris Dreyer
That all changed in 1977 when one Phoenix law firm ran an ad in a local newspaper that became the basis for the landmark decision in Bates v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State as the employer in the Classified Service2 and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State as the employer in the Classified Service2 and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 1:48 pm by Michael Oykhman
Some examples of intimidation under s.423.1(1) may include: Intimidating a lawyer, judge, police officer, or journalist by following them to and from their place of work. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 11:33 am by Editor Charlie
[vi]  These governance issues are symptomatic of what may be much greater problems with the administrative capabilities of The MLC, Inc. that may be metastasizing but have not yet risen to the level of a public inquiry. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 12:18 pm by Suraj Vyas
”This means that on the blockchain there is a URI (kind of like the blockchain version of a URL, but not exactly) that is cryptographically assigned to your public address AND that URI points directly to the image of X (or a text file that will take you to X) on the open, public internet. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:02 am by Richard Hunt
File first in federal court or, in all likelihood, lose in state court. [read post]