Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 361 - 380 of 19,463
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2016, 6:00 am by Duets Guest Blogger
Coca-Cola only surveyed in 10 of the 27 Member States, which the court held to be less than a ‘significant proportion’ of the relevant public for the Mark. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Just one week before, however, we had discussed Rescuecom v Google (...), a case where the United Stated Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit come to the opposite conclusion on the exact same facts. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
The judgment merely states thatcat conceptually confused “it is sufficient to recall that, according to settled case-law, the repute of a trade mark is relevant, in assessing the likelihood of confusion, only as regards the repute of the earlier mark”, citing Gitana v OHIM — Teddy (GITANA), T‑569/11 (2013) (para 98). [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 9:06 am by Marcel Pemsel
Väderstad appealed to the General Court and limited its trade marks to the goods for which they had been found to be sufficiently represented but lacked distinctiveness. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:13 pm by Matthew D. Lee
On May 30, the newly-formed Philadelphia Chapter of the Federal Bar Association’s Section on Taxation will host a meet-and-greet event with the Honorable Mark V. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:58 am by CMS
In this case comment, Stephen McNaught, Mark McMurray, Josh Risso-Gill and Gael Hardie, who all work within the planning team at CMS, comment on the decision recently handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and another [2020] UKSC 20, which concerned “listed buildings”. [read post]