Search for: "State v. Parker "
Results 361 - 380
of 1,756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2007, 6:00 am
State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2020, 7:51 am
Parker won in State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 11:02 am
NDAs spark Opternative v Warby Parker dispute: Last week, Warby Parker - an eyewear retailer - was hit with a trade secrets lawsuit brought by Opternative (a Chicago-based healthcare technology start-up) in the Southern District of New York alleging that Warby Parker violated a non-disclosure agreement and misappropriated trade secrets. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 10:40 pm
Diehr, 450 U.S. 175, 192 (1981); Parker, 437 U.S. at 589 n.9; Cochrane v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 7:38 am
The style of the case is Fredonia State Bank v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
Parker, 2018 U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 5:10 pm
David Parker, Jr., No. 112,959 (Sedgwick)Direct appeal (petition for review); Possession/Fleeing and EludingChristina M. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:45 am
Parker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:37 am
” Nardino Colotti, et al. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 1:00 pm
The Second Circuit (Sullivan, Chin and Parker [dissenting in part] says: Our case law is clear: 'it is not the proper role of courts to encourage nullification.' United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 10:18 am
Parker (Economic Development; Tribal Law) Lower Brule Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 6:05 am
In the case, PAJ, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 2:17 am
The qualification is that “the Lanham Act’s tolerance for similarity between competing marks varies inversely with the fame of the prior mark,” Kenneth Parker Toys Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:52 am
Harrison v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 7:26 am
This rule is exemplified in the 1987, Texas Supreme Court case, Crawford v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 5:47 am
In Parker v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 6:21 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 11:53 am
Luna v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 10:48 am
The style of the case is, Barbara Misle v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
As the Court of Appeals stated in People v. [read post]