Search for: "State v. Penns"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,376
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2018, 1:30 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:39 am
French, Professor of Practice at Penn State Law, has published “English Justice for an American Company? [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:32 pm
Unfortunately, the majority’s broad view of 1182(f)’s delegation missed its more tailored role in the INA’s overall plan (see the amicus brief for immigration scholars on which I served as co-counsel with Shoba Wadhia of Penn State and WilmerHale’s Alan Schoenfeld, Ben Gifford and Francisco Unger). [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm
Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia is the Samuel Weiss Faculty Scholar and founding director of the Center for Immigrants’ Rights Clinic at Penn State Law. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 1:00 pm
Supreme Court granted cert in Timbs v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 3:20 pm
Osofsky, Dean at Penn State Law; Sonja West and Emma Hetherington, Georgia Law; RonNell Anderson Jones, Utah Law; Dahlia Lithwick, Slate; Mary-Rose Papandrea, North Carolina Law; Lisa Radtke Bliss, Andrea A. [read post]
28 May 2018, 9:30 pm
Pennsylvania, which is to appear in the Penn State Law Review 123 (2018): Scholars have repeatedly looked to the history of cases like Dred Scott, Brown, and Roe for guidance on whether courts should issue broad decisions on contentious issues. [read post]
27 May 2018, 6:18 am
Pennsylvania, will be published in the Penn State Law Review. [read post]
6 May 2018, 10:41 am
From the Framing to Today," based on my Penn Law Review article. [read post]
3 May 2018, 12:55 pm
Sosa v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 5:02 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:23 am
Erskine's position was quoted by the defense in the 1806 case United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 2:16 pm
” [Part I, here] [Part II, here] [Part III, here] [Part IV, here] [Part V, here] [And the piece in full, as a single document, from SSRN] The symposium is organized under the “2018 Symposium: Future of Legal Ed” tag. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 2:16 pm
” [Part I, here] [Part II, here] [Part III, here] [Part IV, here] [Part V, here] [And the piece in full, as a single document, from SSRN] The symposium is organized under the “2018 Symposium: Future of Legal Ed” tag. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:46 pm
(Immigration law scholars made this argument in an amicus brief in which I served as co-counsel with Shoba Wadhia of Penn State and WilmerHale’s Alan Schoenfeld, Ben Gifford, and Francisco Unger.) [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:12 pm
” (Hari Osofsky, Penn State – University Park) “If lawyers are not available to help those with modest resources navigate through divorces, small business problems, or evictions, we should be training students to address such issues rather than the complex and somewhat rarefied corporate or insolvency issues that demand familiarity with both Australian and U.S. law. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 12:32 pm
” (Hari Osofsky, Penn State – University Park) “The contributors to this excellent symposium on the Future of Legal Education have proposed large-scale changes to the ways that law schools are organized and the ways that law schools teach. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 5:11 am
Early cases, such as the 1803 Runkle v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 5:01 am
Part V offers evidence that this remained true from 1880 to 1930. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 5:00 am
But Knauff cannot bear the weight the government places on it—as immigration law scholars explain in an amicus brief filed in Trump v Hawaii on the history of the Immigration and Nationality Act, in which I served as co-counsel with Shoba Wadhia of Penn State and WilmerHale’s Alan Schoenfeld, Ben Gifford, and Francisco Unger. [read post]
