Search for: "State v. Ponds" Results 361 - 380 of 434
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am by Kenneth Anderson
  Not academics like me who are not big fish within the pond to which that letter is addressed — national security conservatives and centrists. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
The company also agreed to stock a pond with fish to replace those killed by the spill and spend about $100,000 to plant vegetation to improve water quality in a creek, according to a news release from the Justice Department and the Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
The EPA said it will excavate tailings and contaminated soil at the site and place a protective barrier over contaminated sediments in the tailings impoundment pond. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:48 am by Asbestos Litigation
The source of the artichoke was moved to the southwest corner of the Retiro Park pond. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
In a legal settlement reached Tuesday, the state Department of Transportation agreed that whenever it builds new highways, it will also spend a little bit of money to retrofit old ones – thousands of miles of which were constructed without sediment ponds or other pollution controls. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm by Gideon
Walter Olson provides us with a video of John Stossel investigating the Fells Acre prosecutions and convictions (be sure to see Stossel's reaction at the 6:07 mark): Speaking of Attorneys General, whimsical CT law blogger Ryan McKeen stirred up a hornet's nest this week when he asked if current Secretary of State and Gubernatorial Attorney General candidate Susan Bysiewicz was actually qualified for the position (the answer: it depends). [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:58 am by Michael Scutt
Staying with the American theme, apparently adultery is still a crime in some states in the US, although the severity of the offence seems to vary on the state. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 1:34 pm
Now, animals are hardly rational according to most meanings of the term "rational," but they do tend to satisfy preference consistency, and hence their strategic interactions can be cogently modeled as rational action---even if the creatures are pond scum or dung beetles. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 1:58 pm by Rick
(I have taken the quote directly from Berger v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 12:30 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
What qualifies as "property" and the right to exclude: While the consent of individual officials representing the United States cannot "estop" the United States, see Montana v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 3:33 pm by WSLL
Summary of Decision issued November 6, 2009 Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Pond v. [read post]