Search for: "State v. Pounds"
Results 361 - 380
of 3,054
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2011, 8:54 am
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003). [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
[1] International Energy Group Limited v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2012] EWHC 69 (Comm) [2] Barker v Corus UK Ltd [2006] UKHL 20 [3] International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2013] EWCA Civ 39 [4] BAI (Run off) Ltd (In Scheme of Arrangement) and others v Durham and others [2012] 1 WLR 867 [5] Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22 The post Case Preview: International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich… [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:27 am
Introduction In these joined appeals, the Supreme Court considered whether the “revised benefit cap” – the effect of which is to restrict the maximum amount of benefits payable to couples and lone parents to £23000 in London and £20000 elsewhere – discriminated against the lone parents of young children, and against the children themselves. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:01 am
[1] Arnold v Britton & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 902 (22 July 2013), para 45 [2] Ibid, para 50 [3] Ibid, para 57 [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
The borrowers' argument involves saying that, whereas in the case of, say, a loan of £1,000 repayable with interest and a document fee of £50 repayable without interest, the amount of credit is £1,000, nevertheless in the case of such a loan but with a document fee of £50 repayable with interest, the amount of credit is £1,050. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
The borrowers' argument involves saying that, whereas in the case of, say, a loan of £1,000 repayable with interest and a document fee of £50 repayable without interest, the amount of credit is £1,000, nevertheless in the case of such a loan but with a document fee of £50 repayable with interest, the amount of credit is £1,050. [read post]
25 May 2016, 12:00 pm
"Earlier this week, the Kat received an email from Chief Master Marsh in the Chancery Division who stated that all was not to be feared. [read post]
4 May 2022, 10:06 am
In this post, Amy Wilkinson, a senior associate in CMS’ financial crime team, comments on the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Crown Prosecution Service v Aquila Advisory Ltd [2021] UKSC 49. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 5:26 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:16 am
Lord Toulson stated that considering the principles of Target Holdings v Redfern, a monetary reward which reflects neither loss caused nor profit gained by the wrongdoer, such as the one argued by the appellant, would be penal. [read post]
8 May 2008, 7:31 am
Shooting the homeowner's 66-pound American Straffordshire Terrier, which is closely related to and resembles a pit bull terrier, was not excessive force, either, the memorandum decision stated. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:16 am
On Tuesday the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm
Mr Spicer was instead fined £1,000, ordered to pay £500 in costs, and given nine penalty points. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 2:03 pm
" (The case he refers to, but doesn't link to is Zinkland v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
Furthermore, the short-term nature of s 17 was further illustrated by the fact that HC’s annual package for accommodation, food and utilities was approximately £11,368.76 and the local authority’s annual budget for s 17 support was £12,000. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:22 am
Aisling O’Dwyer, an associate in the IP team and Ella Wells, a trainee patent attorney at CMS, comment on the decision which is awaited in the matter of Shanks v Unilever Plc & Ors. [read post]
30 May 2016, 8:04 am
., state prison vs. county jail). [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 11:21 am
Payne had received a Social Fund loan of £843 in September 2007. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 11:21 am
Payne had received a Social Fund loan of £843 in September 2007. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:26 am
The amount that B previously paid by way of service charge was £55,000, whereas the service charge certificate issued in January 2019 was for £400,000. [read post]
