Search for: "State v. Quick"
Results 361 - 380
of 5,459
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2023, 8:50 am
In a throwback to the days of this being a weekly show, your co-hosts Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck are back on a quick turnaround in order to debate and discuss: A new seditious conspiracy conviction arising out of Jan. 6 A New York State “material support” prosecution (State v. el Faisal) Various SCOTUS updates Any classified documents that we might have found when cleaning up the ol’ office The shocking arrest of the former FBI Special Agent… [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:20 am
Megan also covers Congress’s “TayTay v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:07 am
” Duszynski v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
In State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 4:33 am
” In Gilley v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am
Quick links Employment Writes: Grainger v The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster: “Is it right that that person should be deprived of a remedy because their non-theism is wrapped up in a cloak of spaghetti? [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
In 1984, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called Graham v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:00 pm
But 4 justices agreed with Justice Brennan that knowledge of your product ending up in the forum state -- which virtually certainly existed here -- was good enough even without the "additional conduct" listed by O'Connor, and Justice Steven says that knowledge plus a certain number of continuous sales gets his vote too, resulting (as there) in a majority on that score. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Next, Justin gives us a quick primer on the national security reasons for regulation of submarine cables. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:55 pm
Next, Justin gives us a quick primer on the national security reasons for regulation of submarine cables. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 8:09 am
She was also not a particularly quick opinion writer on the D.C. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:41 am
We’re going to cross the pond and we’re going to get a report on some interesting issues and recent cases that have been adjudicated over in the United Kingdom and a view from our friends in the UK regarding the state of competition law on some important topics that my partner, Stephen Critchley, will introduce. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 10:53 am
Or more precisely, this argument echoes the position raised in Walter Nixon v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
In caselaw, lawyers and historians can rely on new historical evidence to challenge previous rulings, as the Organization for Americans Historians did in Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 1:28 am
Quick links Jason Loch, A Venerable Puzzle: Goodbye Court Of Claims, Hello Coronation Claims Office. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 12:18 pm
So, you wouldn’t put an image on the blockchain (especially because that would make it publicly viewable too since it would be on the ledger forever).A quick legal side note: Keep in mind, you don’t usually own the copyright for the art (even when you buy it physically in the “real world”). [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Article V, because it requires two-thirds of Congress and three-fourths of the states, is, as Sandy Levinson has put it, functionally dead. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 7:29 am
Vital Proteins LLC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am
In the recent past, AI-generated art has become increasingly ubiquitous owing to the quick turnaround time and detailed prompts to collaborate and create artwork. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
Unedited video footage shows he shot Washington four times in quick succession. [read post]
