Search for: "State v. R. W. S."
Results 361 - 380
of 5,792
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:00 am
R (Cornwall Council) v Secretary of State for Health; R (Cornwall Council) v Somerset County Council, heard 18-19 March 2015. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
R (C) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 October 2015. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 1:00 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 29-30 April. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 2:00 am
R (Bourgass & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 16-17 February 2015. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 1:00 am
R (O) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 19-20 January 2016. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
United States) and June 27, 2023 (Counterman v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 10:00 pm
In Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et. al. v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 6:53 am
Accordingly, they invite the court to declare CPA 2004, s 3(1) incompatible with their ECHR rights, pursuant to the Human Rights Act (“HRA”) 1998, s 4. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:26 am
R (Cornwall Council) v Secretary of State for Health; R (Cornwall Council) v Somerset County Council, heard 18-19 March 2015. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:00 am
R (Gibson) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 5 Dec 2017. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:00 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 29-30 April. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative… [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 10:28 am
Fix and Jenna V. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 2:19 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others (Respondents), heard 20-22 October 2020 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd,… [read post]
