Search for: "State v. S. L. L."
Results 361 - 380
of 20,597
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Wolf, and Jonathan L. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Daniel L. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
United States, the Court found the agency’s decision to follow GAO’s recommendation to evaluate the protester’s proposal as though its key personnel was unavailable was irrational.[1] In this case, KPMG proposed Mr. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 11:51 am
v=WgcrmuKK-iY&t. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
The leading case of Barnhill v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:05 pm
L. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:53 pm
The law on which the case is based must be “a law of Canada” as the phrase is used in s. 101 of the Constitution Act, 1867” (citing ITO-Int’l Terminal Operators v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
” The petition contended that the listing rule violated the Equal Protection clause and, by compelling controversial disclosure, the First Amendment, citing the conflict minerals decision, Nat’l Ass’n of Mfrs. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:08 pm
Va. 2003), and Biogen lnt’l v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 2:42 pm
L. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:07 pm
This would be a Scott v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Pott v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:02 am
While these new guidelines are not legally binding, they offer important insight into how the Office plans to apply an even more flexible approach to obviousness — something Director Vidal sees as mandated by the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
The internationally recognized Mexican government under President Andrés Manuel López Obrador is actively working to suppress the cartels, with U.S. support. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:41 am
In Witt v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:15 pm
§ 240.14a-1(l)(1)(iii)(A) . [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Joanna L. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm
Reins Int’l Cal., Inc.), California courts have used the state’s supposed overriding interest in PAGA cases to invent a host of novel rules, nearly all of which redound to the benefit of plaintiffs. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 11:51 am
State of N.Y. v. [read post]