Search for: "State v. Sample" Results 361 - 380 of 4,107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2013, 3:40 pm by Cicely Wilson
Maryland v King, United States Supreme Court (6/3/13)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal LawAfter his arrest on first- and second-degree assault charges, King was processed through a Wicomico County, Maryland, facility, where personnel used a cheek swab to take a DNA sample pursuant to the Maryland DNA Collection Act (Act), which authorizes officers to collect DNA samples from persons charged with violent crimes. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 12:54 pm by Sean Hanover
Although failure to provide a breath sample is manifest expression of "consciousness of guilt" (see Stevenson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:49 pm by Eugene Volokh
Although previously we upheld the constitutionality of the Act, as applied to convicted felons, in State v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:03 pm by Kent Scheidegger
For property crimes, there was no significant difference between the California cities in the sample and those in the rest of the country, a 5.1% drop for the former, and a 4.9% drop in the latter. [read post]
23 May 2013, 3:25 pm
However, in April 2013, the United States Supreme Court ruled on this issue in Missouri v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 7:40 pm
In brief sampling, starting with the First Circuit, the court summarized the standard in Wine and Spirits Retailers, Inc. v. [read post]