Search for: "State v. Siegel" Results 361 - 380 of 491
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Starting in 1999, using Section 304 of the Copyright Act, Siegel’s heirs recaptured his rights to the Superman character. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Starting in 1999, using Section 304 of the Copyright Act, Siegel’s heirs recaptured his rights to the Superman character. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Starting in 1999, using Section 304 of the Copyright Act, Siegel’s heirs recaptured his rights to the Superman character. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am by Lloyd Jassin
  Starting in 1999, using Section 304 of the Copyright Act, Siegel’s heirs recaptured his rights to the Superman character. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Starting in 1999, using Section 304 of the Copyright Act, Siegel’s heirs recaptured his rights to the Superman character. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:51 am by Jim Sedor
The money followed a legal but circuitous route turbocharged by the 2014 ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:30 am by David Pozen
Meanwhile, a proposal to break up California into three states nearly made it onto the ballot last November. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm by Stephen Sachs
Garza, as well as a number of important cases in state or circuit courts.) [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:30 pm
The plaintiffs, Robert Voelker, Nancy Lund, and Liesa Montag-Siegel outside of the Lewis F. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Guest Blogger
As Neil Siegel (whose constitutional riff is, among the contributors here, closest to mine) appropriately puts it, I am (like him) “a structuralist at heart. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:20 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Most publishing contracts contain a clause that states the contract term is in perpetuity. [read post]