Search for: "State v. Singh"
Results 361 - 380
of 853
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2015, 5:14 pm
Hardeep Singh is a freelance journalist and was the defendant in His Holiness v Singh. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:18 am
In this context, consider the following from Satterwhite v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:03 pm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:42 am
Congress lacks the power to commandeer the states and may only offer the states a choice. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 10:40 am
It is not clear whether the State satisfied the court on this issue. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
” Bigler, 451 F.3d at 733; Singh v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
Opposition is growing over State Government plans to extend defamation laws. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am
[Disclaimer: Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson.] [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am
In Holt v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
[Disclaimer: Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson.] [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am
United States, 14-282, is yet another gift from the St. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Firstly, the authorities are unclear on what percentage of the population has to be at risk before a country is removed from the white list (in R (Husan) v SSHD [2005] EWHC 189 Admin 1% of the population was considered ‘significant’, yet in Singh v SSHD & Anor [2001] EWHC 925 (Admin), 0.76% of the population was not). [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 8:18 am
In Singh v Pierpont, 2014 WL 6471374 (D. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:02 am
At ThinkProgress, Bryce Covert reports that forty-three “sexual harassment cases have been dismissed” in the wake of Vance v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
[Disclaimer: Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson.] [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:00 am
In such cases the court is not discussing the truth or reasonableness of any of the doctrines of the religious association, but as stated by Lord Davey in General Assembly of the Free Church of Scotland v Overtoun [1904] AC 515 (1904 7 F (HL) 1): “The more humble, but not useless, function of the civil Court is to determine whether the trusts imposed upon property by the founders of the trust are being duly observed. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:35 am
And the firm's Tejinder Singh serves as counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
Farina, 13-1227, a state-on-top habeas case involving how much leeway a federal court is allowed in determining that a state court made an unreasonable factual determination; and Whitman v. [read post]
