Search for: "State v. So" Results 361 - 380 of 117,450
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2024, 7:57 am by Professor Alberto Bernabe
  If they were corporate records that the client gave the lawyer to store, there is no reason to believe that they are protected by the attorney-client privilege, so calling them so would be a mistake. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:37 am by Peter J. Sluka
  The merger was negotiated while the entire sports betting industry held its breath; the Supreme Court was considering Murphy v National Collegiate Athletic Assn, 584 U.S. 453 (2018) the case that allowed states to legalize sports gambling. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Arnold LJ dissented, considering that the relevant event/state of affairs cannot be overcome by an offer of non-contractual performance. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, Justice Sotomayor’s opinion for the Court last year in Dubin v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm by Béligh Elbalti
However, before doing so, some light should be shed on the proceedings before the Canadian court. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 7:20 pm by Selina Coleman and David Bender
May allow state regulations to fill the gaps, which would create more of a patchwork approach for purposes of compliance across states. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 12:23 am by Frank Cranmer
It no longer commits to banning so-called conversion therapy, stating: “It is right that we take more time before reaching a final judgement on additional legislation in this area”. [read post]