Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 361 - 380
of 5,807
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court in Biden v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:29 am
Supreme Court today in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
In Hurley v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:57 am
(The 1970s-era standing decision in question is United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:19 am
Thomas rejects conventional history by taking the same slapdash approach to the evidence as characterizes his majority opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:03 am
From Justice Sotomayor. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm
” Justice Sotomayor, writing in dissent, argued that the majority undermined the promise of racial equality at the heart of Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:34 pm
Bollinger (2003) and Fisher v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
The majority effectively, though not explicitly, overruled its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 8:31 am
” Cummings v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:33 am
Contra, EEOC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:18 am
Justices Sotomayor and Gorsuch write separately to state that the recklessness test is OK for some true threat cases, such as this Internet stalking case, but that the Court should leave open the possibility that a different mens rea standard might apply in other true threat cases. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:05 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 8:01 am
Sotomayor and Gorsuch concurred. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 2:14 pm
Today, the Court resolved the question in Counterman v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:33 pm
It argued that a decision from 1945, International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 12:31 pm
Jones v. [read post]