Search for: "State v. South" Results 361 - 380 of 12,082
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2023, 10:27 pm by Martin Osborne
If you have any questions regarding the matters raised in this article, please contact the authors. [1] CCIG Investments Pty Ltd v Schokman [2023] HCA 21 at [4]-[6]. [2] Ibid at [12], citing Bugge v Brown (1919) 26 CLR 110 at 118; New South Wales v Lepore (2003) 212 CLR 511 at 589 [223]; Sweeney v Boylan Nominees Pty Ltd (2006) 226 CLR 161 at 173 [33]; Prince Alfred College Inc v ADC (2016) 258 CLR 134 at 148 [40]. [3] Ibid at [14]. [4] Schokman… [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am by John Elwood
But the court declined without comment to take up the state of South Carolina’s twice-relisted petition in Stirling v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 2 November 2023, the District Court of New South Wales struck out and dismissed proceedings in the case of Woolf v Brandt [2023] NSWDC 460 on the basis that they were brought outside the limitation period. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm by Ilana Korchia
  As of July 18, 2023, a total of 10 outbreak-associated cases of hepatitis A have been reported from four states (CA (2), HI (1), OR (1), WA (6)). [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
States also have a corresponding obligation to regulate the protection of human rights in sport, and to provide access to efficient and effective legal remedies for cases of discrimination or other human rights abuses by sporting bodies or private actors.4. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:39 am by Tristan Marot
The case of BP Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd v Trade Rose Investments (Pvt) Ltd revolves around an application for security for costs, a procedural safeguard embedded within South African litigation framework. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 12:41 pm by NARF
(Tribal Court Jurisdiction; Indian Child Welfare Act) United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP: The redistricting suit challenges a South Carolina’s congressional map drawn by the state’s Republican-controlled legislature. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:54 am by David Pocklington
With regard to the concerns of the SPAB [16] to [21], the Chancellor stated: “[22]. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:11 am by Susan Haines
 The case centered around one textile mill in Darlington, South Carolina, which – along with 25 other mills in the South and New England – was owned and controlled by the Milliken family through Roger Milliken, who was the President and active manager for each mill. [read post]