Search for: "State v. Spy" Results 361 - 380 of 922
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2016, 9:30 am by azatty
Hotel del Coronado, San Diego, site of the State Bar of Arizona CLE By the Sea. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
However, the actual spying powers of the BND are largely unaffected by the new rules. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 11:40 am by Caitlin Gilligan, Rishabh Bhandari
Recent success in Syria and Iraq against the Islamic State might have negative consequences, Reuters reports. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 8:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Unclear how far the Court had gone, and remains unclear; Court hasn’t taken a commercial speech case since then, though it has had Reed v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 11:03 am by rainey Reitman
We are also engaged in FOIA litigation to uncover more about NSA spying and we serve as amicus in several key cases challenging NSA surveillance in the United States. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:30 am by David Markus
Those are the allegations in this motion to dismiss filed by Howard Srebnick and Rossana Arteaga-Gomez in U.S. v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 12:44 pm by Benjamin Wittes
The FISA Court still has no role in supervising overseas spying, nor must the president inform Congress when she initiates new overseas spying programs. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
The campaign, set up by the Don’t Spy On Us coalition, features posters of Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese Premier Xi Jingping. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:58 pm by Alex R. McQuade
Meanwhile, a new poll finds that Americans’ perceptions of the United States’ fight against the Islamic State are becoming more positive. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
  The Investigatory Powers Bill or “Snoopers Charter”, for example, could set a dangerous precedent and a bad example internationally by giving Britain’s intelligence and police agencies sweeping powers to spy on on vague grounds. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 2:35 am by INFORRM
  The Courts have since added that the conduct must be ‘oppressive and unreasonable’ (Thomas v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1233). [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:24 pm by Cindy Cohn
The Supreme Court rejected the latter scenario as unconstitutional in Ferguson v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 11:05 am by Cody M. Poplin
The Compliance with Court Orders Act of 2016 comes in response to the ongoing FBI v. [read post]