Search for: "State v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 257,195
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
   Sander v Westchester Reform Temple 2024 NY Slip Op 03064 Decided on June 5, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
   Sander v Westchester Reform Temple 2024 NY Slip Op 03064 Decided on June 5, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The complaint (full text) in United States Conference of Catholic Bishops v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am by Eleonora Rosati
This analysis is consistent with recently published decisions by both the General Court and the Boards of Appeal on the topic, inter alia: mataharispaclub v EUIPO - Rouha (SpaClubMatahari), Gugler France v EUIPO - Gugler (GUGLER), R 1320/2022-4, CELESTINO, and R 470/2023-2, TOYA (fig.).Therefore, it is crucial for bad faith applicants to prioritise thorough, high-quality evidence collection for a successful case. [read post]
The appeals court found the prohibition to be consistent with the free speech protections of the US Constitution’s First Amendment under Tinker v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
If the patient later asks for water (in a delirious state), caregivers can “stick to the agreements made with the patient when she was still able to exercise her will. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Part II, which will run in our Fall / Winter ’24 issue, will focus on the post-World War II decades when the pendulum began to swing the other way and state law evolved to make voting easier and broaden voting rights, while maintaining the integrity of voting systems.Next, Mitchell Keiter looks back at the Robins v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 7:24 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit considered arguments in the case of Defense for Children International–Palestine v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm
Last year, in a high-profile case (and opinion), a Ninth Circuit panel held that A.B. 5 -- passed essentially to try to classify Uber and Lyft drivers as employees rather than independent contractors (something that Proposition 22 later reversed) -- was likely unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause, despite the fact that the standard of review was rational basis. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:47 am by Josh Blackman
Chief Justice Roberts gave the traditional toast ("To the President of the United States"). [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am by Scott Bomboy
In Pennsylvania, a case now at that state’s Supreme Court, Penncrest School District v. [read post]