Search for: "State v. Stolen"
Results 361 - 380
of 3,245
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2022, 10:00 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently addressed the issue of novelty as an element of an idea theft claim in Wexler v Hasbro. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 3:25 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The 2-to-1 decision, came in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 9:48 am
Comstock v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:00 am
§ 1595a(c)(1)(A), the statute that prohibits stolen, smuggled, or clandestinely imported goods from being introduced into the U.S.The district court in Brooklyn is expected to approve the stipulation.In July, a federal district court in Albany, NY forfeited two other antiquities appearing in the Becchina archive in the unrelated case of United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:15 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:38 am
The case is State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:27 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:13 pm
United States (Indian Health Service; Contract Support Costs) Yurok Tribe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
One example is the conviction he secured in the case of People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:20 am
State, the defendant was charged with theft of property worth $500 or more based on an allegation that Champagne had stolen a computer. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:11 am
State v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 10:56 am
The grandson of a woman whose valuable painting was confiscated by the Nazis can sue an arm of the government of Spain to recover it, the Ninth Circuit en banc held today in Cassirer v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 5:30 am
For a detailed history, please see United States of America v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 8:10 am
On September 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:41 am
Fourth, the paintings could be forfeited because there was “probable cause to believe that they were brought to the United States contrary to law, the possessors of the Defendant Paintings [were] aware that they were stolen and are attempting to offer the Defendant Paintings for sale . . . . [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 3:39 pm
" citing People v Baskerville, 60 NY2d 374, 382 (1983) and referencing People v Jackson, 2 AD3d 893, 896 (2003), lv denied 1 NY3d 629 (2004). [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 4:43 pm
State (Oct. 24, 2011). [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:50 am
That was the question addressed by the First Circuit in its recen opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 2:00 am
Waldo v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 12:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
