Search for: "State v. T. C."
Results 361 - 380
of 17,160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
`[C]ontent-based restrictions on speech have been permitted, as a general matter, only when confined to the few “historic and traditional categories [of expression] long familiar to the bar”’ U.S. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 8:43 am
Dep’t of State (D.D.C.) -- determining that agency performed reasonable search for records concerning plaintiff’s imprisonment in Mexico and that it properly invoked Exemptions 5, 6, and 7(C). [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
by Michael C. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 2:49 am
Magistrate Judge James C. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 8:57 am
Today’s Second Circuit summary order in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
We don’t ordinarily delve into campaign finance issues but the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 10:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 6:02 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
I still haven’t blogged last year’s In re Social Media Addiction rulings from the California federal and state courts. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 1:43 pm
On January 23, 2012 the Supreme Court released its opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 4:12 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:13 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:49 am
ESRT Empire State Building, L.L.C. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 9:19 pm
State v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:10 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 5:00 am
TEXAS No State Income Tax UTAH 2.30 - 6.98 (t) 6 1,000 (b) - 5,501 (b) 2,550 (d) 5,100 (d) 2,550 (d) * (t) VERMONT (a) 3.6 - 9.5 5 30,650 (u) 336,551 (u) 3,400 (d) 6,800 (d) 3,400 (d) VIRGINIA 2.0 - 5.75 4 3,000 - 17,000 900 1,800 900 WASHINGTON No State Income Tax WEST VIRGINIA 3.0 - 6.5 5 10,000 - 60,000 2,000 4,000 2,000 … [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 1:45 pm
So the latter determination wasn't "before" the final judgment on the merits, hence Section 1447(c) doesn't apply. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 4:25 am
United States v. [read post]