Search for: "State v. Taste"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2022, 9:56 am
The position of the EUIPO, when it comes to acquired distinctiveness through use in the UK for the purposes of an invalidation action against a registered EU trade mark (EUTM), is that the distinctiveness acquired through use in the UK is not relevant for EU trade mark applications filed after the end of the transition period (December 31st, 2020).However, the now said has not always been entirely clear, since case law (Decathlon v EUIPO (T‑349/19) EU:T:2020:488), states that… [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 5:44 am
The second case, Raniere v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 11:10 am
S. 570, 582 (2008), and that this “Second Amendment right is fully applicable to the States,” McDonald v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 9:19 am
Vermont Transco LLC v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:11 pm
The court of appeals began with an example clearly demonstrating that non-infringing comparative advertising can still be false advertising: an ad stating that “In a blind taste test, 9 out of 10 New Yorkers said they preferred Brand X Coffee to Brand Y Coffee. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 8:28 am
” United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 12:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 10:02 am
Boswell v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:17 am
United States, holding that the use of a “Stingray” cellsite simulator required a warrant under the Fourth Amendment, Chris Seaton and Andrew King were challenged to debate whether the Third-Party Doctrine or the Supreme Court’s Riley v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 7:35 am
In fact, the Givauden court, citing Fox v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 12:59 pm
Jeppesen, would jeopardize state secrets. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
The Court granted certiorari in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:13 am
The Nebraska Supreme Court recently handed down a new Fourth Amendment decision, State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:54 pm
This sheep wore wolf's clothing, and had a taste for red meat. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 7:35 am
It tends to leave rather a bad taste in my mouth. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
In Alexander v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:40 am
” If a majority of the Justices choose to side with the State of California and open the floodgates to a new era of speech regulation, I very much looking forward to seeing how they reconcile that with their decision last term in the controversial case of United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 11:28 am
App. 27, 27 (1909) (finding no error based on jurors being permitted to taste liquid that was allegedly illegal whiskey); Morse v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 12:08 pm
United States are irreconcilable. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 10:15 am
Rosenblum v. [read post]
