Search for: "Stephens v. Jackson*"
Results 361 - 380
of 517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 2:13 pm
Its important to remember the the Supreme Court has already ruled that EPA cannot consider cost in selecting a standard (ATA v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:51 am
But it was the Supreme Court's 2008 decision in a Kentucky case, Baze v. [read post]
9 May 2009, 6:00 am
Bowles 85,000 170,000 0 255,000 Stephen B. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 6:19 am
I first explain how Bebchuk’s work has shaped subsequent research; in particular, I discuss the many significant works by prominent scholars (such as Stephen Bainbridge, Frank Easterbrook and Dan Fischel, Jonathan Macey, Colin Mayer, and Lynn Stout) and prominent practitioners (such as Martin Lipton, Barbara Novick and Leo Strine) that have been written to engage with Bebchuk’s research in various areas. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:00 pm
Clanton v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 8:26 am
Scalia and Thomas have a clear and large-scale vision for constitutional law, in which (for example) affirmative action is abolished, Roe v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:14 am
 With Justice Stephen G. [read post]
20 May 2018, 8:02 am
Stephen Durbin and Associates and considered it a violation of the Solicitors Act, finding it a contingency fee arrangement under a different name. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 5:55 am
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court issued what I believe will end up being one the most significant employment decisions of the last decade—Staub v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:35 pm
"David Souter was shattered" (page 177), so Bush v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 8:25 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:09 am
The justices were hearing Merrill v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:19 am
The Korematsu v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 11:26 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:47 pm
"] In Smith v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 2:53 am
Citations: Explainer: The Leak of Supreme Court’s Draft Roe v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 12:17 pm
And Justice Stephen Breyer on occasion just holds his head in both hands. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm
A snapshot of recent cases, for example, shows that £10,000 can easily be incurred by one party just to get to strike out or summary judgement (see reports on Lait v Evening Standard, Kordowski v Hudson, Robins v Kordowski) – and for some cases this incredibly conservative (Apsion v Butler). [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm
No, we learn, Gorsuch was with Bostock and Stephens from the beginning. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am
On 2 May 2018, Sir Geoffrey Vos heard an application in the case of Appleby v BBC. [read post]
