Search for: "Stevens v. United States Department Of Justice"
Results 361 - 380
of 700
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
” See Justice Stevens’ opinion in Hamdan v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:55 pm
Stewart, of the Department of Justice. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:02 pm
It relied heavily upon the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 2:17 pm
The other case, United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:51 am
The other case, United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
This principle was famously laid down in the case of Sidhu v British Airways (where passengers could not sue at common law for harm resulting from their plane having been high jacked following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), and subsequently applied by senior courts around the world, including notably the United States Supreme Court in El Al Israel Airlines v Tseng (though Justice Stevens there dissented). [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:23 am
A: United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:24 am
Earlier this month, Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Eileen Bransten issued a ruling in Zacharius v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 1:10 pm
United States. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
In the United States Code, for example, there are exemptions: in food inspection laws, allowing the preparation of food in accordance with religious practices, 7 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Perhaps that is what Justice John Paul Stevens (Retired) had in mind when he stated last year: I really think that in regard to the death penalty . . . [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
Equally fortunately, I can confidently state that none of the programs we will be discussing today were within my purview when I was at the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
Department of Justice; a government filing clarifying language in its briefs. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 6:01 pm
(Josh Blackman, guest-blogging) Nearly everything written about calls for Justice Kagan to recuse in NFIB v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am
But even the majority in Kiowa Tribe called upon Congress to correct the rule of tribal immunity, which Justice Stevens called “strikingly anomalous. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Although it was the product of a 2-1 split decision, the ruling in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:05 pm
Stewart, of the Department of Justice. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
