Search for: "Stock v. Stock"
Results 361 - 380
of 8,827
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2010, 6:22 am
In the press release, Black & Decker stated “[p]ersonal business relationships between individuals (as opposed to relationships with the company) generally are not relevant to the independence tests under the New York Stock Exchange rules because they do not create a material relationship between a director and the company. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:38 pm
On November 2, 2009, the California Supreme Court handed down its decision in Schachter v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:38 pm
On November 2, 2009, the California Supreme Court handed down its decision in Schachter v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 3:50 am
The Defalco Email does mention stock options in passing, but not in the portion of the email that discusses the tax treatment of stock “received in connection with employment. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 6:38 am
Stock exchange rules and state corporate law often rely on the “independence” of a company’s board of directors as a mechanism for policing potential conflicts of interest that might arise between and among the company’s various constituencies. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 7:30 am
Stock image. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 10:12 am
Stock image. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
Watson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:47 am
Stock image. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 4:21 am
In Seidensticker v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
Stock image. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 7:05 am
Stock image. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 10:00 pm
Partner John Kober authored an article for The Texas Lawbook discussing employee stock ownership plan and trust (ESOP) duties for company directors, which have taken on heightened significance as set forth in the Su v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 2:48 pm
Osvath v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 11:26 am
Lockhart v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 10:35 am
Hall v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 9:53 am
Stock image. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 3:42 pm
Stock image. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 12:24 pm
Stock image. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 12:03 pm
Stock image. [read post]
