Search for: "Stokes v. Stokes" Results 361 - 380 of 574
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2013, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
” Subsequently, in fact, the Court adopted this broader view eight years later in Moore v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:29 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The court emphasizes as in the case of United States v Rombon, Stokes v Genakos and People v Jiles that there exists no constitutional right to juvenile treatment. [read post]
26 May 2013, 6:20 am by Paul Horwitz
It is the title of Michael Stokes Paulsen's famous article about Lemon v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:01 am by Shouvik Kumar Guha
Image from hereThe readers of Spicy IP may be interested to know of the manner in which what had started off as a brief spark in the Indian copyright scenario is fast being stoked into a raging fire all over the country and beyond. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
The Supreme Court released its decision on the centuries-old Alien Tort Statute (ATS) in Kiobel v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm by Doug Kendall
Indeed, the scholarship of conservatives such as McConnell, Calabresi, Michael Stokes Paulsen, and Judge John T. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 2:25 pm
In the instant action it has not been demonstrated that there was a duty to indemnify as relates to the co-defendants nor has it been demonstrated that CHSLI is vicariously liable for the actions of Joanne Stokes. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 10:49 am
This number is expected to jump by 20 percent in 2011, stoking demand for U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:17 am by Adam Wagner
I wonder if Daily Express readers will remember that the next time the paper stokes up anti-immigrant feeling. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:51 am by Cormac Early
Howard Fischer of Capitol Media Services (via the Arizona Daily Star) has coverage of three amicus briefs filed yesterday in Brewer v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:53 pm by Rachel Marcus
It seems dangerously close to asking the court to adjudicate on religious doctrine, exactly what it said – quite rightly – it would not do in Khaira v Shergill [2012] EWCA Civ 983. [read post]