Search for: "Strauss v. Strauss"
Results 361 - 380
of 618
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2011, 9:57 am
" (App.265) Hirst v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 4:57 am
" (App.265) Hirst v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:06 pm
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, 504 F.3d 1262, 1267 (Fed. [read post]
20 May 2011, 8:41 am
Last year in Egeland v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 5:50 am
See Van Aggelen v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 3:14 am
In Lauro v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 8:37 am
Les évènements récents mettant en cause Dominique Strauss-Kahn (DSK) sont une bonne occasion de comparer l’image que l’on a du système pénal américain et celle du système français. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:46 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:35 am
Last year, the Second Circuit held in Brzak v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:53 am
Just two years ago, in Strauss v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:15 am
See People v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:52 am
Dowd, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, said in a statement that day that his client intends to appeal. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:30 pm
Marshall also considered Levi Strauss v Abercrombie & Fitch and the degree of similarity which was needed in order to establish confusion. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:01 am
Matter of Englese v Strauss 2011 NY Slip Op 02876 Decided on April 5, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department The parties stipulated in their divorce to joint physical and legal custody of their two children. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
” He looked to the seven-factor test in Strauss v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm
In Strauss v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 11:05 am
From Jeff Bercovici:Jesse Strauss, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said the suit is based on a claim of unjust enrichment. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:13 am
Activision (No Doubt sues over use of likeness in Band Hero) Lexology: http://tinyurl.com/6afzxzp Westlaw: http://tinyurl.com/6yrkbj8 Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 7:47 pm
Landsman & Funk v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:53 am
Previously relying on the requirement that a mark be “identical or nearly identical” to the plaintiff’s famous mark for dilution to exist, the 9th Circuit in Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
