Search for: "Strickland v. United States" Results 361 - 380 of 498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
United States (seven). [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm by Jeff Gamso
Walker, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-7314, the only case among the group in which the respondent had not yet filed a brief. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am by John Elwood
Brown, 17-887 Issue: Whether the Indiana procedure that allows trial-counsel Strickland v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:28 am
The Supreme Court has found ineffective assistance only a handful of times since it raised the bar in a 1984 case, Strickland v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-6113, and Bazan v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 12:07 am
We're the government, and we're here to copy - Blueport Co. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
United StatesDocket: 11-959Issue(s): (1) Whether, when a false statement is made to an individual who has no connection whatsoever to the federal government, the false statement is nonetheless made in a “matter within the jurisdiction” of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
17 May 2022, 12:09 pm by Phil Dixon
A canine unit arrived around 15 minutes into the stop and alerted, leading to the discovery of methamphetamine and guns. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:48 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-1164Issue: Whether the Quiet Title Act’s statute of limitations is a jurisdictional requirement or a claim-processing rule. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 10:23 am by John Elwood
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]