Search for: "Strickland v. Washington"
Results 361 - 380
of 552
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm
Kulbicki 14-848Issue: Whether an appellate court violates the core principles of Strickland v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:57 am
McNutt, 62 M.J. at 21, citing to Washington v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Washington and Davis v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 2:17 pm
” Under Strickland v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 12:16 pm
Finally, I’ll offer why Strickland v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
Avery Issue: Whether the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which affirmed the grant of a habeas petition, abrogated the "prejudice" prong of Strickland v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 6:58 am
See Strickland v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:30 am
Strickland v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:30 pm
Washington claim, when the state court addressed only one of the components in denying relief. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
The US Supreme Court heard argument last month in McCoy v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:11 pm
Although the district court denied relief (concluding that Wilson could not demonstrate “prejudice” under the Supreme Court’s Strickland v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:44 am
Washington and Davis v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
Washington, 19-333, involving a First Amendment challenge to a state’s efforts to impose penalties on a floral designer who refused for religious reasons to provide flowers for same-sex weddings. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 10:07 am
Under the Supreme Court’s seminal decision in Strickland v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 4:08 pm
As such, this was a Strickland violation. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Washington under Section 2254(d)(1); and (3) whether the lower court misapplied Harrington v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 12:38 pm
The Supreme Court recognized in Strickland v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:02 am
And in Archdiocese of Washington v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 6:06 am
Texas, 18-9674 Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
